history
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
history [2017/03/18 16:38] – pmueller | history [2021/12/18 11:45] (current) – pmueller | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ====== History ====== | ||
- | + | < | |
- | === 22.5.2016 | Example on GitHub available now === | + | |
- | {{:wiki:news: | + | |
- | [[wiki: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === 16.4.2016 | Astah SysML === | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === 29.3.2016 | EA12.1 Release === | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === 2.1.2016 | Good design practice: Leader State Machine - Follower State Machines === | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | [[wiki: | + | |
- | ===== 2015 ===== | + | |
- | + | ||
- | ---- | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === 1.12.2015 | Maintenance Release === | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === 19.09.2015 | Generating Activity Code from Modelio Models === | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | === 11.08.2015 | Using State-Machines and activity diagrams to realize a ModbusRTU client === | + | |
- | {{:wiki:news: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === 14.6.2015 | Version 3.6.9 === | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === 1.5.2015 | Version 3.6.8 === | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === 15.3.2015 | Bookshelf === | + | |
- | Recently I wrote [[wiki: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === 25.2.2015 | Enterprise Architect Version 12 === | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === 12.02.2015 | Using State-Machines in Low-Power Embedded Systems II === | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === 02.01.2015 | Using State-Machines in Low-Power Embedded Systems === | + | |
- | + | ||
- | {{: | + | |
- | ===== 2014 ===== | + | |
- | + | ||
- | ---- | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === 15.11.2014 | New Screencast === | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === 09.11.2014 | New version 3.6.7 === | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === 14.09.2014 | Need to design state diagrams on a Unix like OS? === | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | ===5.9.2014 | Do you develop for iOS or OS X and want to use Swift? === | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === 1.9.2014 | New version 3.6.6 === | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === 20.7.2014 | New version 3.6.5 === | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === 24.06.2014 | Reading data from an energy meter via Modbus - Activity diagram in practise === | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === 16.6.2014 | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === 16.6.2014 | New version 3.6.4 === | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === 7.6.2014 | Generate code from Astah* activity diagrams (new version 3.6.3) === | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === 24.5.2014 | New version 3.6.2 === | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === 18.5.2014 | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === 18.5.2014 | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === 18.5.2014 | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === 28.2.2014 | New release 3.51 === | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | === 2.1.2014 | New release 3.5 of the code generator === | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | ===== 2013 ===== | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | ---- | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | === 3.11.2013 | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | choice state. The latest beta supports this feature now. [[wiki: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === 21.09.2013 | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === 21.9.2013 | Multiple instances of the same state machine? === | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === 10.9.2013 | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | Users who have the need for sub-machines, | + | |
- | this latest version. See an example machine [[wiki: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === 16.08.2013 | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | [[wiki: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === 23.07.2013 | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | We are pleased to announce that the latest version of the code-generator now also supports | + | |
- | C/C++/Java code generation from XMI files, exported from Metamill. For an example how state diagrams look like in Metamill take a look [[wiki: | + | |
- | The demo version contains the fully working microwave oven example which is used in the manual. | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | === 20.04.2013 | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | This becomes more tricky if your model is based on conditions as triggers (see section A.4. in the handbook if you wander what conditional triggers are about). Let's assume the emergency button is connected to port pin '' | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | === | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | === 26.1.2013 | Thermostat example shows the power of regions === | + | |
- | + | ||
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | In this example a thermostat design is shown using regions to model parallel running parts of the controller. We explain under which circumstances regions are useful to use and how the generated code looks like. Read more how you can benefit from regions in your designs [[wiki: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | === 3.1.2013 | Version 3.1 available === | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | ===== 2012 ===== | + | |
- | ---- | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | After installing Cygwin and Java the examples compiled without problems. EA10 loads existing projects, | + | |
- | no incompatibilities have been found. Working with regions in EA10 is easier now. | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | === | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | ===== 2011 ===== | + | |
- | ---- | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | * Visualization of the coverage percentage in simulation mode. This tells you how good your test is. | + | |
- | * Visualization of the transitions that have not been taken so far and are required to take to achieve 100% test coverage. With this info at hand you can quickly improve your test script or test procedure. | + | |
- | * Generation of an Excel sheet with all the test routes required for 100% transition coverage. This sheet can be the basis for your test instruction document. | + | |
- | * Possibility to attach constraints to the states. This information is added to the test route Excel sheet and informs the tester about the expected behavior in this state. This information can be informal text like “all lights off” or more formal like “relay 0 := off”. Whatever is appropriate for your application. | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === 06.10.2011 | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === 23.08.2011 | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === 04.07.2011 | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | ===== 2010 ===== | + | |
- | ---- | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === ★ 28.11.2010 | + | |
- | In version 2.21 a new C++ backend was added. To select this backend call the code generator with the new command line flag ’-l cppx’. It has two additional features: | + | |
- | * State machines are not limited to three hierarchy levels anymore but can have more levels of nesting (like cx) . This is an important feature if you want to model really complex things. | + | |
- | * It is now possible to inline all entry/ | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === ★ 06.11.2010 | + | |
- | + | ||
- | It is now possible to generate Java code from your design. Just one class is created containing the whole logic. This has the benefit that your Java project does not become bloated with all kinds of helper classes. | + |
history.txt · Last modified: 2021/12/18 11:45 by pmueller